Most patients who have a high volume chylothorax and who require operative repair have an iatrogenic chylothorax. This most commonly occurs after esophagectomy. This is because the chylothorax is secondary to an injury to the main thoracic duct. The patient who has a chylothorax after a pulmonary resection rarely requires re-operation because the leak is usually from a tributary of the main duct as a result of lymph node dissection. For that reason, and since spontaneous chylothoraces (usually from lymphoma) rarely require thoracic duct ligation, this discussion is focused on the post-esophagectomy patient.
The thoracic duct is a tubular structure that is 2 to 3 mm in diameter, valved, and paper-thin. It is the main conduit of the lymphatic system. It is a fibrin-less system that runs in the posterior mediastinum. It originates as the cisterna chyli, which lies on top of the second lumbar vertebral body, and ascends anterior to the vertebral bodies, usually on the right side (Figure 1). It enters the chest through the aortic hiatus, crosses from the right side of the chest to the left at the level of the fourth or fifth thoracic vertebra, and usually empties into the left jugulosubclavian venous junction (Figure 2). It has a highly variable course (Figure 3) and is subject to injury during any abdominal, thoracic, or neck procedures in these areas. Trauma to the main duct rarely closes spontaneously.
Chylothorax after esophagectomy should be suspected when there is an unexplained high volume chest tube output that turns milky white after enteral tube feedings are started. It is often serosanginous until then. The diagnosis is confirmed by a triglyceride level of 110 mg/dl or greater, the presence of chylomicrons in the chest tube drainage, a positive Sudan stain, or, if needed, lipoprotein electrophoresis. Once the diagnosis is secured early intervention is critical. Although an exact volume of output as a threshold has not been shown, when the effluent is greater than 800 cc per day for 4 –5 consecutive days waiting for the leak to stop on its own is a waste of time. Moreover, it risks leukopenia and malnutrition. We suggest re-operation with thoracic duct ligation within five to seven days after the initial procedure. Total parental nutrition with complete cessation of all oral intake, somatostatin, medium chain triglyceride diets and percutaneous injection of sclerotic agents into the cisterna chyli will most likely fail in this situation. Re-operation should not be delayed.
Prior to re-operating a contrast swallow should be performed to ensure there is no large anastomotic leak that should also be addressed at re-operation. Some authors recommend a lymphangiogram prior to re-operation. This can be helpful in delineating the anatomy of the thoracic duct, which is aberrant in almost 40% of patients. The study can also identify the leak. However, lymphangiography is difficult to perform and few radiologists across the country do it enough to do it well. They have little experience in cannulating a small duct in the foot and then performing and reading the test.
Once re-operation is decided upon, the first step is to decide where to make the incision. Lymphatic leaks can occur in the neck, in the abdomen, or in either or both chests, and they can be controlled in any of those compartments. This discussion focuses on transthoracic ligation, but the surgeon must decide which chest to enter. Usually the decision is simple – explore whichever chest has the chest tube in it with the chyle draining out of it. However, often after an Ivor Lewis operation the chyle can drain primarily into the left chest. There may be some drainage of chyle out of the right-sided chest tubes but the gastric conduit obscures a large pleural effusion. In this situation a left-sided tube should be placed and the amount of drainage should be measured in order to determine which approach is best. Re-operation usually is best via a re-do right thoracotomy. The main advantage of ligating the thoracic duct via a left VATS or left thoracotomy is that the conduit does not have to be retracted off the vertebral bodies and is not in the way. The disadvantages of going on the virginal left side are that you have committed the patient to recover from bilateral thoracotomies and you cannot perform a mechanical pleurodesis to help obliterate the pleural space.
Since a re-do right thoracotomy is most commonly needed and recommended we will discuss it step by step:
![]() |
| Figure 4. Technique for suturing a thoracic duct injury using pledgets for reinforcement. |
No special equipment is needed. A wide malleable retractor is ideal to help retract the stomach up and off of the vertebral bodies. The FocalSeal® or other sealant should be prepared and the cream needs to be ordered pre-operatively.
The results of early closure of the thoracic duct for a high output iatrogenic chylothorax after esophagectomy are excellent. When re-operation is not delayed and simple duct closure of any type is performed, patients have little added morbidity and the reported success rates are around 90%. The technique described above features not only duct ligation caudal to the leak but also includes ligation of the cephalad end of the duct, and adds a mechanical pleurodesis and sealant or glue to cover the area of the leak. When this technique is used the success rate approaches 100%. In our experience in 13 patients there have been no failures utilizing this technique. Moreover, ten of these 13 patients had long delays in resolution of chylothorax owing to either failed medical treatment or failed re-operative treatment performed at other institutions. If one performs a second re-operation on a persistent leak after an attempted repair, especially if the patient’s other operations were performed elsewhere, we strongly recommend a pre-operative lymphangiogram. It ensures that the duct does not have some unusual course and that no large leaking collateral is present.
Publication Date: 1-Dec-2003
Last Modified: 7-Oct-2009
©2012 CTSNet